Biological Order, or Levels of Organization11 Oct 1998 11:00
The whole notion that living things are organized in hierarchical levels (monomers inside macromolecules inside membranes inside organelles inside cells inside organs inside organisms) seems to have been thrust upon a willing world in the '20s and '30s by people like Joseph Needham (his Order and Life is a really classic exposition) and Waddington and Woodger (qv. below). This is now a thoroughly received notion, the sort of thing diagramed in high school biology texts, usually with a pair of arrows, one pointing up to show new properties emerging, and another pointing down to show components constrained by the level above ("downward causation"); "and another going nowhere at all just for show."
Probably it's pretty much correct, but I can't help thinking it's much too pat. Where, for instance, do bones fit in this? Or the endocrine system? Furthermore downward causation seems suspect to me. I'd be much more comfortable with lateral causation: the component molecules of (say) a membrance are constrained, yes, but by each other.
Suppose that instead of looking at spatial encapsulation, at what is inside what, we looked at causal isolation, so that item A in the hierarchy includes lower-level items B, C, D if B, C and D interact more strongly with each other than with the outside world, and this is no longer true is we remove any one of the three, or add a fourth. I think this comes closer to "dividing according to the natural formation, where the joint is, not breaking any part as a bad carver might" (Plato); in fact it seems to me that the spatial hierarchy always makes some kind of implicit appeal to autonomy to rule out arbitrary boundaries, which would say include half the liver, and a little bit of the left lung as well. (But the new scheme allows for such oddly shaped items, if their parts are strongly connected.) Furthermore, the causal version can be extended to machines, or societies of organisms, with less hand-waving and grimacing. --- This idea comes from thinking about Christopher Alexander's Notes on the Synthesis of Form, where drives home the point that, if you want to break a problem up into solvable pieces, spatial proximity is much less useful than causal links. (I'm agnostic about his specific algorithm for carving at the joints, and I think he's come to feel the same way.)
Now: does this give us any sort of handle on self-organization in general? It's easy to say, "Yes, if a new level of the hierarchy forms, that it self-organization," and there are cases where this seems to fit: spiral waves, say, or the more common objects in Life, are spatially well-defined and relatively autonomous. (In the lab, do we ever see any sort of pattern of spiral waves?) However,
- How can you tell when this happens?
- Is self-organization always the same as a new level of the hierarchy?
- Is there in fact only one hierarchy?
- Walter Fontana and Leo W. Buss, " `The Arrival of the Fitest': Towards a Theory of Biological Organization," Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 56 (1994): 1--64 [online]
- Joseph Needham, Order and Life
- A. R. Peacocke, An Introduction to the Physical Chemistry of Biological Organization [Lots of physical chemistry, little biological organization]
- To read:
- Henri Atlan, L'organisation biologique et la theorie de l'information [Surely this must have been translated?]
- E. Bienenstock, F. Fogelman Soulie, G. Weisbuch (eds.), Disordered Systems and Biological Organization
- Peter Dittrich and Pietro Speroni di Fenizio, "Chemical organization theory: towards a theory of constructive dynamical systems", q-bio.MN/0501016
- Andre Lwoff, Biological Order
- Ron Maimon, "Computational Theory of Biological Function I", q-bio.MN/0503028
- Jay E. Mittenthal, Arthur B. Baskin (eds.) Principles of Organization in Organisms
- Harold J. Morowitz, Energy Flow in Biology; Biological Organization as a Problem in Thermal Physics
- Susan Oyama, The Ontogeny of Information
- Henry Quastler
- The Emergence of Biological Organization
- (ed.), Essays on the Use of Information Theory in Biology
- George Terzis and Robert Arp (eds.), Information and Living Systems: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives
- J. H. Woodger
- Axiomatic Method in Biology [Attempt to apply the methods of mathematical logic to biology, c. 1937; "with appendices by Alfred Tarski". Unfortunately he takes "organized system" as a primitive term...]
- Biological Principles: a Critical Study